Last Update: 10.05.2011 11:20
Lindheim (Dur 66) bases his identification on the assumption that OE hymele does not denote 'hops, Hopfen' because the ModE plant name is a borrowing from 15th century Netherlands.[4] Lindheim explains: "Ae. hymele < lat. HUMULUS oder +HUMILUS [generally glosses] allerlei Rankengewächse, z.B. eine 'Winden-Art' (POLYTRICHON und VOLVULA) Herb, LII und WW 379/13, die Zaunrübe' [...] Herb. LXVIII." Bonser (1963,360), who does not dismiss the identification ēowo-humele = H.lupulus, considers the identification with Bryonia: "From the occurence of the compound hege-hymele it is obvious that this plant grew wild in the hedges in Anglo-Saxon times; from that of the compound éowo-hymele (female hop-plant ?) it would appear that the Anglo-Saxons were aware that it was dioecius, though this is also true of the common bryony with which it is equated in the A.S. Herbal." But the denotation 'sheep-hops, Schaf-humele' can also have other reasons; cf., for example, the G names of Bryonia, which stem from the form of the plan's berries: NHG Schaftreck, Schafentel, NL schaapkeutel, schaapentel.[5]
|
|
? Humulus lupulus L., hop, Gewöhnlicher Hopfen |
|
Botanical-Information: stylised plate Source: →reference-information
Thomé, Otto Wilhelm.
Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. In 4 Mappen ; 531 Tafeln in naturgetreuen Farben mit 668 Pflanzenarten. Leipzip: Teubner, 1938.
|
OE hymele is not identifyed distinctly.
Cf. Marzell (2000,II,902): "Der Hopfen ist zweihäusig. Die männlichen Blüten (Staubblüten) sind in herabhängenden Rispen angeordnet, die weiblichen (Stempelblüten) sind in kleinen Zapfen vereinigt."
Cf. Jordan (1967,149), who notes that ModE "ewe" is used to denote plant names even today.
This reasoning is doubtful, cf. Hoops (1911,I,282): "über den ersten Anbau des Hopfens in England sind wir nicht unterrichtet: er hat jedenfalls vor dem 16.Jh. keine nennenswerte Bedeutung gehabt."
Cf. Marzell (2000,I,685): "HERBA DICTA A SIMILITUDINE FIMI OVILLI."
This identification (BT., s.v.; Cockayne 1962,III,325) is based on the assumption that it was known to the Anglo-Saxons that the hop plant (→hymele)[1] is dioecious[2] and the felmal (medicinal) plant was called ēowo-humele (according to OE ēowu 'ewe, weibliches Schaf'[3] galt.